My New Order A Collection of Speeches by Adolph Hitler Volume Two

I agree. Why is Donald Trump on here. That is a terrible thing to do to Hitler.

Ridiculous that the publisher would put our Presidents face on a book of Hitler speeches. The left is a joke.

While it's unfair to compare someone like Hitler to our glorious leader Donald Trump since there are so many dissimilarities (Hitler was a vegetarian who never tasted a Big Mac, was a war hero, didn't have a bizarre operation to move hair from the back of his scalp to the top oh his head, was well versed in history, a passable artist, devoted to his partner, and had the decency to off himself in a bunker) one can see how some would see similarities between two rabble rousers with serious emotional problems who happen to have the power to incite millions of weak imbeciles. For this reason this book gets 5 stars.

Everyone who disagrees with me is a Nazi.

Why is MY president's picture on the cover with this less than human piece of crap???!!!🇺🇸😡

Having read both volumes of this book (both the original book as translated into English and the two volumes of this book as published in August of 2016 and including the editorial commentary), I found both the original volumes to be highly interesting, but found these two new volumes to be exceptionally interesting specifically because of the nearly identical parallels that the commentary addresses.Many people will be turned off by the sheer size of these two volumes (each roughly 500 pages... in the original; the German original of My New Order was over a thousand pages in one volume; Mein Kampf in one volume - the translation closest to the German original as by Reynal & Hitchcock  - is almost 450 pages... as Hitler's speeches were long, so were his writings).The added commentary in this book(s) make it that much better due to the FACT that that commentary parallels current events so closely. In fact, much of this same commentary would apply to many other. political leaders of other ultra rightwing and fascist-oriented groups (especially those who have shown some success in the political arena) - both currently and in the past to include the WW2 era (Mussolini, Peron, etcetera) and not just Trump.As far as similarities (specifically as to Trump), there are a great many (both in speeches and in political campaign strategies and tactics). Both - primarily using the high-charged rally environment - gave speeches that used the authoritarian personality projection approach that is often confused with "charisma".Much of the content in My New Order is about how Hitler says propaganda works, and how he structures his speaking style, and how Hitler targets the lowest-common denominator as his intended audience. Those same methodologies were present in Trump speeches (and interviews and Tweets), in the way he speaks, argues, rages and responds in public. Trump’s speeches are filled with simplistic racist attacks.He belittled and insulted his competitors for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination and then his competitor for the presidential campaign as well as Republicans who did not support him absolutely.He attacks Democrats’ "political correctness" “as weak.He mocks women, minorities, and disabled people.He is anti-Semitic (Arabs) and Islamophobic (as Hitler was anti-Semitic / Jewish), attacking them verbally as well as other minorities and women.He attacks liberals, elitists, establishment types, academia, and even moderates who aren't "true believers".He threatens to obliterate the enemies (who he often openly names).He doesn’t care about facts or inconsistencies.And he plays to his followers’ fears, prejudices, and hates.All of these tactics, from the repetitive style of his speeches, to believing whatever he says is true, to his excessive and unrivaled view in his leadership, are modeled by Hitler in My New Order.Even the Hitler-authored Mein Kampf (written previously to My New Order) has a chapter on the hows and whys of political propaganda. Look at these six excerpts from Ralph Manheim’s 1943 translation.Hitler wrote (in that section of Mein Kampf):- “The function of propaganda does not lie in the scientific training of the individual, but in calling the masses’ attention to certain facts, processes, necessities, etc., whose significance is thus for the first time placed within their field of vision.”-“All propaganda must be popular and its intellectual level must be adjusted to the most limited intelligence among those it is addressed to. Consequently, the greater the mass it is intended to reach, the lower its purely intellectual level will have to be.”- “The more modest its intellectual ballast, the more exclusively it takes into consideration the emotions of the masses, the more effective it will be. And this is the best proof of the soundness or unsoundness of a propaganda campaign, and not success pleasing a few scholars or young aesthetes.” (Aesthetics... What would be today referred to as "liberals", "elitists" and "academia")- "Once understood how necessary it is for propaganda to be adjusted to the broad mass, the following rule results: It is a mistake to make propaganda many-sided, like scientific instruction, for instance.”- “In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands what you want him to understand by your slogan.”- “The function of propaganda is, for example, not to weigh and ponder the rights of different people, but exclusively to emphasize the one right which it has set out to argue for. Its task is not to make an objective study of the truth… its task is to serve our own Right, always and unflinchingly.”An equally apt comparison could be made with Trump to Benito Mussolini (the original true fascist; the Nazi movement as developed by Hitler was a modified type of fascism albeit as absolutely totalitarian).

If this was just a collection of speeches it would be okay, but the author includes obviously biased editorial against the GOP (similar to watching Rachel Maddow or Ed Schultz). The book was a waste of my time.